(Publisher of Peer Reviewed Open Access Journals)

International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration (IJATEE)

ISSN (Print):2394-5443    ISSN (Online):2394-7454
Volume-11 Issue-112 March-2024
Full-Text PDF
Paper Title : Transformative role of machine learning in design optimization of reinforced concrete frames
Author Name : Syed Aqeel Ahmad, Tabish Izhar, Tasneem Ahmed and Neha Mumtaz
Abstract :

Design optimization in reinforced concrete (RC) frames is crucial for achieving more efficient, cost-effective, and safe constructions. This involves determining optimal section sizes and reinforcing schemes to enhance structural performance, reduce construction expenses, and conserve natural resources. An optimized design contributes to streamlined construction procedures, shorter construction times, and improved overall sustainability. This paper critically evaluates the current literature on machine learning (ML) applications in the design optimization of RC structures, focusing on the period from 1997 to 2023. The study employs a comprehensive methodology, including bibliometric analysis, to analyze trends, research collaborations, and publication patterns. The results highlight the increasing interest in ML for RC frame optimization. Key applications of ML in design optimization include material characterization, design exploration, optimization algorithms, sensitivity analysis, predictive modeling, structural health monitoring, design code compliance, uncertainty quantification, data-driven design decisions, and design collaboration. The study identifies significant ML algorithms used in optimization, such as the trial-and-error method, linear programming (LP), and non-linear programming (NLP). Overall, the paper provides insights into the evolving landscape of ML applications in RC frame design, emphasizing the potential for interdisciplinary collaboration and future research directions.

Keywords : Machine learning, Reinforced concrete frame, Optimization, Bibliometric analysis, LinLog/Modularity.
Cite this article : Ahmad SA, Izhar T, Ahmed T, Mumtaz N. Transformative role of machine learning in design optimization of reinforced concrete frames. International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration. 2024; 11(112):437-458. DOI:10.19101/IJATEE.2023.10102336.
References :
[1]Kazemi F, Asgarkhani N, Jankowski R. Machine learning-based seismic fragility and seismic vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete structures. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2023; 166:107761.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[2]Esfandiari MJ, Urgessa GS. Progressive collapse design of reinforced concrete frames using structural optimization and machine learning. Structures. 2020; 28:1252-64.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[3]Esfandiari M, Haghighi H, Urgessa G. Machine learning-based optimum reinforced concrete design for progressive collapse. Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering. 2023; 23(2):1-8.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[4]Shen Z, Pan P, Zhang D, Huang S. Rapid structural safety assessment using a deep neural network. Journal of Earthquake Engineering. 2022; 26(5):2625-41.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[5]Zhou XQ, Huang BG, Wang XY, Xia Y. Deep learning-based rapid damage assessment of RC columns under blast loading. Engineering Structures. 2022; 271:114949.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[6]Lekshmi A, Jose YS. Thermal performance of building components insulating by polystyrene material via optimal machine learning. Oxidation Communications. 2021; 44(1):243-56.
[Google Scholar]
[7]Yahiaoui A, Dorbani S, Yahiaoui L. Machine learning techniques to predict the fundamental period of infilled reinforced concrete frame buildings. Structures. 2023; 54:918-27.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[8]Ashish MJ, Asiya A, Navya D, Ganesh KG, Robin DP. Machine learning approach to failure mode prediction of reinforced concrete in filled frames. In proceedings of SECON: structural engineering and construction management 2021 (pp. 899-907). Springer International Publishing.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[9]Zhang Y, Burton HV, Sun H, Shokrabadi M. A machine learning framework for assessing post-earthquake structural safety. Structural safety. 2018; 72:1-6.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[10]Liu J, Liu P, Feng L, Wu W, Li D, Chen F. Towards automated clash resolution of reinforcing steel design in reinforced concrete frames via Q-learning and building information modeling. Automation in Construction. 2020; 112:103062.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[11]Esteghamati MZ, Flint MM. Developing data-driven surrogate models for holistic performance-based assessment of mid-rise RC frame buildings at early design. Engineering Structures. 2021; 245:112971.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[12]Latif I, Banerjee A, Surana M. Explainable machine learning aided optimization of masonry infilled reinforced concrete frames. Structures. 2022; 44:1751-66.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[13]Rayjada SP, Raghunandan M, Ghosh J. Machine learning-based RC beam-column model parameter estimation and uncertainty quantification for seismic fragility assessment. Engineering Structures. 2023; 278:115111.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[14]Ghaffar SH, Burman M, Braimah N. Pathways to circular construction: An integrated management of construction and demolition waste for resource recovery. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020; 244:118710.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[15]Jin-bao SH, Yan XI, De-wei YA, Ji-hao YA, Kai DO. Key technologies and applications of safety diagnosis and smart management of reservoir dams. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. 2022; 44(7):1351-66.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[16]Eleftheriadis S, Duffour P, Greening P, James J, Stephenson B, Mumovic D. Investigating relationships between cost and CO2 emissions in reinforced concrete structures using a BIM-based design optimisation approach. Energy and Buildings. 2018; 166:330-46.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[17]Yousuf S, Alamgir S, Afzal M, Maqsood S, Arif MS. Evaluation of daylight intensity for sustainbility in residential buildings in cantonment cottages Multan. Mehran University Research Journal of Engineering and Technology. 2017; 36(3):597-608.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[18]Zhang X, Zhang X. Sustainable design of reinforced concrete structural members using embodied carbon emission and cost optimization. Journal of Building Engineering. 2021; 44:102940.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[19]Yeo D, Gabbai RD. Sustainable design of reinforced concrete structures through embodied energy optimization. Energy and Buildings. 2011; 43(8):2028-33.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[20]Saini B, Sehgal VK, Gambhir ML. Least-cost design of singly and doubly reinforced concrete beam using genetic algorithm optimized artificial neural network based on Levenberg–Marquardt and Quasi-Newton backpropagation learning techniques. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization. 2007; 34:243-60.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[21]Habte B, Yilma E. Cost optimization of reinforced concrete frames using genetic algorithms. An International Journal of Optimization and Control: Theories & Applications. 2021; 11(1):59-67.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[22]Rahmanian I, Lucet Y, Tesfamariam S. Optimal design of reinforced concrete beams: a review. Computers and Concrete, An International Journal. 2014; 13(4):457-82.
[Google Scholar]
[23]Fragiadakis M, Lagaros ND. An overview to structural seismic design optimisation frameworks. Computers & Structures. 2011; 89(11-12):1155-65.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[24]Yang XS, Bekdaş G, Nigdeli SM. Review and applications of metaheuristic algorithms in civil engineering. Metaheuristics and Optimization in Civil Engineering. 2016:1-24.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[25]Salehi H, Burgueño R. Emerging artificial intelligence methods in structural engineering. Engineering Structures. 2018; 171:170-89.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[26]Akbarnezhad A, Xiao J. Estimation and minimization of embodied carbon of buildings: a review. Buildings. 2017; 7(1):1-24.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[27]Afzal M, Liu Y, Cheng JC, Gan VJ. Reinforced concrete structural design optimization: a critical review. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020; 260:120623.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[28]De DO, Maier G. Mathematical programming methods for the inelastic analysis of reinforced concrete frames allowing for limited rotation capacity. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering. 1972; 4(3):307-29.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[29]Angelucci G, Quaranta G, Mollaioli F, Kunnath SK. Correlation between seismic energy demand and damage potential under pulse-like ground motions. In international workshop on energy-based seismic engineering 2023 (pp. 234-49). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[30]Lagaros ND. A general purpose real-world structural design optimization computing platform. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization. 2014; 49:1047-66.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[31]Zheng J, Dong LG, Zheng SS, Zeng L, Xiang ZH, He W. Researching a fuzzy-and performance-based optimization method for the life-cycle cost of SRHPC frame structures. Applied Sciences. 2017; 7(3):1-19.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[32]Zhu M, Yang Y, Gaynor AT, Guest JK. Considering constructability in structural topology optimization. In structures congress 2014 (pp. 2754-64). ASCE.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[33]Talatahari S, Gandomi AH, Yang XS, Deb S. Optimum design of frame structures using the eagle strategy with differential evolution. Engineering Structures. 2015; 91:16-25.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[34]Sun H, Burton HV, Huang H. Machine learning applications for building structural design and performance assessment: state-of-the-art review. Journal of Building Engineering. 2021; 33:101816.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[35]Mumtaz N, Izhar T, Pandey G, Labhasetwar PK. Utilizing artificial intelligence for environmental sustainability. In artificial intelligence for renewable energy systems 2022 (pp. 259-79). Woodhead Publishing.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[36]Mangalathu S, Jeon JS. Classification of failure mode and prediction of shear strength for reinforced concrete beam-column joints using machine learning techniques. Engineering Structures. 2018; 160:85-94.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[37]Bekas GK, Stavroulakis GE. Machine learning and optimality in multistorey reinforced concrete frames. Infrastructures. 2017; 2(2):1-12.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[38]Han X, Cai Y, Yang M, Ji J. Parameter sensitivity of the earthquake damage prediction model for an RC frame structure, Journal of Harbin Engineering University. 2023; 44(4):563-71.
[Google Scholar]
[39]Meshref A, El-dash K, Basiouny M, El-hadidi O. Implementation of a life cycle cost deep learning prediction model based on building structure alternatives for industrial buildings. Buildings. 2022; 12(5):1-21.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[40]Gunes B. One-class machine learning approach for localized damage detection. Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring. 2022; 12(5):1115-31.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[41]Jeon JS, Shafieezadeh A, Desroches R. Statistical models for shear strength of RC beam‐column joints using machine‐learning techniques. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. 2014; 43(14):2075-95.
[Google Scholar]
[42]Wang J, Xie Y, Guo T, Du Z. Predicting the influence of soil–structure interaction on seismic responses of reinforced concrete frame buildings using convolutional neural network. Buildings. 2023; 13(2):1-14.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[43]Salmi ZJ, Khodakarami MI, Behnamfar F. Development of seismic fragility curves for RC/MR frames using machine learning methods. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering. 2023; 24(3):823-36.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[44]Jarkas A, Horner M. Revisiting the applicability of learning curve theory to formwork labour productivity. Construction Management and Economics. 2011; 29(5):483-93.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[45]Krawinkler H, Zareian F, Medina RA, Ibarra LF. Decision support for conceptual performance‐based design. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. 2006; 35(1):115-33.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[46]Shayan RS, Assi R. Assessment of seismic acceleration demands on nonstructural components in moderately ductile RC frame buildings designed according to NBC 2015. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering. 2023; 50(4):335-47.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[47]Islam H, Jollands M, Setunge S, Bhuiyan MA. Optimization approach of balancing life cycle cost and environmental impacts on residential building design. Energy and Buildings. 2015; 87:282-92.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[48]Alawdin P, Liepa L. Optimal shakedown analysis of plane reinforced concrete frames according to Eurocodes. International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design. 2017; 13:253-66.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[49]Bursi OS, Sun FF, Postal S. Non-linear analysis of steel–concrete composite frames with full and partial shear connection subjected to seismic loads. Journal of Constructional Steel Research. 2005; 61(1):67-92.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[50]Yadav A, Ali AM, Chithaluru P, Singh A, Alammari A, Kumar GV, et al. Hybridizing artificial intelligence algorithms for forecasting of sediment load with multi-objective optimization. Water. 2023; 15(3):1-26.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[51]Awad R. Sizing optimization of truss structures using the political optimizer (PO) algorithm. Structures. 2021. 33:4871-94.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[52]Camp CV, Pezeshk S, Hansson H. Flexural design of reinforced concrete frames using a genetic algorithm. Journal of Structural Engineering. 2003; 129(1):105-15.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[53]Mingqi L, Xing L. Genetic algorithms based methodologies for optimization designs of RC structures. In international conference on intelligent system design and engineering application 2010 (pp. 787-90). IEEE.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[54]Pham BT. Optimum cost design of frames using genetic algorithms. Steel Compos Struct. 2019; 30(3):293-304.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[55]Babaei M, Mollayi M. Multi-objective optimal design of reinforced concrete frames using two meta-heuristic algorithms. Journal of Engineering Research. 2021; 9(4B):166-92.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[56]Wang Q, Schmotzer L, Kim Y. Design optimization of building structures using a metamodeling method. Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on civil, structural and transportation engineering 2018 (pp.137-42).
[Google Scholar]
[57]Afshari H, Hare W, Tesfamariam S. Constrained multi-objective optimization algorithms: review and comparison with application in reinforced concrete structures. Applied Soft Computing. 2019; 83:105631.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[58]Bekdaş G, Nigdeli SM, Yang XS. Optimum reinforced concrete design by harmony search algorithm. Metaheuristics and Optimization in Civil Engineering. 2016:165-80.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[59]Derousseau MA, Kasprzyk JR, Srubar IWV. Computational design optimization of concrete mixtures: a review. Cement and Concrete Research. 2018; 109:42-53.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[60]Ghandi E, Shokrollahi N, Nasrolahi M. Optimum cost design of reinforced concrete slabs using cuckoo search optimization algorithm. Iran University of Science and Technology. 2017; 7(4):539-64.
[Google Scholar]
[61]Skandalos K, Afshari H, Hare W, Tesfamariam S. Multi-objective optimization of inter-story isolated buildings using metaheuristic and derivative-free algorithms. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2020; 132:106058.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[62]Kaveh A, Laknejadi KJ. A new multi-swarm multi-objective optimization method for structural design. Advances in Engineering Software. 2013; 58:54-69.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[63]Gharehbaghi S, Moustafa A, Salajegheh E. Optimum seismic design of reinforced concrete frame structures. Computers and Concrete. 2016; 17(6):761-86.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[64]Li M, Wong BC, Liu Y, Chan CM, Gan VJ, Cheng JC. DfMA-oriented design optimization for steel reinforcement using BIM and hybrid metaheuristic algorithms. Journal of Building Engineering. 2021; 44:103310.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[65]Yin X, Liu Q, Pan Y, Huang X. A novel tree-based algorithm for real-time prediction of rockburst risk using field microseismic monitoring. Environmental Earth Sciences. 2021; 80:1-9.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[66]Rizzian L, Léger N, Marchi M. Multiobjective sizing optimization of seismic-isolated reinforced concrete structures. Procedia Engineering. 2017; 199:372-7.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[67]Nariman NA, Hamdia K, Ramadan AM, Sadaghian H. Optimum design of flexural strength and stiffness for reinforced concrete beams using machine learning. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(18):1-15.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[68]Harry LS, Duong PL, Raghavan N. Exploration of multi-output gaussian process regression for residual storage life prediction in lithium ion battery. In prognostics and health management conference (PHM-Besançon) 2020 (pp. 263-9). IEEE.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[69]Kao CS, Yeh IC. Optimal design of reinforced concrete plane frames using artificial neural networks. Computers and Concrete. 2014; 14(4):445-62.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[70]Khouj MT, Sarkaria S, Marti JR. Decision assistance agent in real-time simulation. International journal of Critical Infrastructures. 2014; 10(2):151-73.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[71]Meng XB, Li HX, Gao XZ. An adaptive reinforcement learning-based bat algorithm for structural design problems. International Journal of Bio-Inspired Computation. 2019; 14(2):114-24.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[72]Rajput SP, Datta S. A review on optimization techniques used in civil engineering material and structure design. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2020; 26:1482-91.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[73]Hasan A, Vuolle M, Sirén K. Minimisation of life cycle cost of a detached house using combined simulation and optimisation. Building and Environment. 2008; 43(12):2022-34.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[74]Payá-zaforteza I, Yepes V, González-vidosa F, Hospitaler A. Cost versus sustainability of reinforced concrete building frames by multiobjective optimization. In life-cycle civil engineering 2008 (pp. 973-8). CRC Press.
[Google Scholar]
[75]Chutani S, Singh J. Use of modified hybrid PSOGSA for optimum design of RC frame. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers. 2018; 41(4):342-52.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[76]Hong WK, Nguyen VT, Nguyen MC. Artificial intelligence-based novel design charts for doubly reinforced concrete beams. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering. 2022; 21(4):1497-519.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[77]Charalampakis AE, Papanikolaou VK. Machine learning design of R/C columns. Engineering Structures. 2021; 226:111412.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[78]Lagaros ND. Artificial neural networks applied in civil engineering. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(2):1-8.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[79]Tapao A, Cheerarot R. Optimal parameters and performance of artificial bee colony algorithm for minimum cost design of reinforced concrete frames. Engineering Structures. 2017; 151:802-20.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[80]Eleftheriadis S, Duffour P, Stephenson B, Mumovic D. Automated specification of steel reinforcement to support the optimisation of RC floors. Automation in Construction. 2018; 96:366-77.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[81]Puskas A, Moga LM. Sustainability of reinforced concrete frame structures–a case study. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning. 2015; 10(2):165-76.
[Google Scholar]
[82]Liao MC, Hsieh TY, Wang WH. Management of gross negligence manslaughter liability construction for professionals and lessons learned. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. 2023.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[83]Perea C, Alcala J, Yepes V, Gonzalez-vidosa F, Hospitaler A. Design of reinforced concrete bridge frames by heuristic optimization. Advances in Engineering Software. 2008; 39(8):676-88.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[84]Felkner J, Schwartz J, Chatzi E. Framework for balancing structural efficiency and operational energy in tall buildings. Journal of Architectural Engineering. 2019; 25(3):04019018.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[85]Gou HY, Yang B, Hua H, Xie R, Liu C, Liu Y, et al. State-of-the-art review of bridge informatization and intelligent bridge in 2019. Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering. 2020; 42(5):14-27.
[Google Scholar]
[86]Lan L, Wood KL, Yuen C. A holistic design approach for residential net-zero energy buildings: a case study in Singapore. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2019; 50:101672.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[87]Lee HJ, Aschheim M, Hernández-montes E, Gil-martín LM. Optimum RC column reinforcement considering multiple load combinations. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization. 2009; 39:153-70.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[88]Swanepoel M, Bright G, Botha IR. Optimized two-axis inertial stabilization platform design for unmanned aerial vehicle integration. In international conference on mechatronics and machine vision in practice 2022 (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[89]Armstrong S, Bostrom N, Shulman C. Racing to the precipice: a model of artificial intelligence development. AI & society. 2016; 31:201-6.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[90]Romão X, Pereira FL. Smart disaster risk reduction and emergency management in the built environment. In industry 4.0 for the built environment: methodologies, technologies and skills 2021 (pp. 315-40). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[91]Lagaros ND. The environmental and economic impact of structural optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization. 2018; 58(4):1751-68.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[92]Sheikh TR, Khan MK, Izhar T. A review on Strengthening of RCC square columns with reinforced concrete jacketing. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology. 2017; 4(3):1797-9.
[Google Scholar]
[93]Dirhamsyah M, Ibrahim IB, Fonna S, Sukhairi TA, Riza H, Huzni S. Toward automation of structural health monitoring: An AI use case for infrastructure resilience in a smart city setting. In international conference on ICT for smart society 2022 (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[94]Hui L, Yue-quan BA, Shun-long LI, Dong-yu ZH. Data science and engineering for structural health monitoring. Engineering Mechanics. 2015; 32(8):1-7.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[95]Pongiglione M, Calderini C. Sustainable structural design: comprehensive literature review. Journal of Structural Engineering. 2016; 142(12):04016139.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[96]Kaveh A, Izadifard RA, Mottaghi L. Optimal design of planar RC frames considering CO2 emissions using ECBO, EVPS and PSO metaheuristic algorithms. Journal of Building Engineering. 2020; 28:101014.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[97]Strauss A, Frangopol D, Bergmeister K. Life-cycle and sustainability of civil infrastructure systems. Proceedings of the third international symposium on life-cycle civil engineering, Vienna, CRC Press; 2012.
[Google Scholar]
[98]Van DH. Concrete material science: past, present, and future innovations. Cement and Concrete Research. 2018; 112:5-24.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[99]Kaveh A. Applications of metaheuristic optimization algorithms in civil engineering. Basel, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2017.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[100]Arana V, Sanchez M, Vidal P. Optimization of structural elements in highly seismic areas using neural networks. In IOP conference series: materials science and engineering 2021 (pp. 1-7). IOP Publishing.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[101]Aydın Y, Bekdaş G, Nigdeli SM, Isıkdağ Ü, Kim S, Geem ZW. Machine learning models for ecofriendly optimum design of reinforced concrete columns. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(7):1-19.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[102]Babiker S, Adam F, Mohamed AE. Design optimization of reinforced concrete beams using artificial neural network. International Journal of Engineering Inventions. 2012; 1(8):7-13.
[Google Scholar]
[103]Bekdaş G, Cakiroglu C, Kim S, Geem ZW. Optimization and predictive modeling of reinforced concrete circular columns. Materials. 2022; 15(19):1-18.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[104]Ferreiro-cabello J, Fraile-garcia E, De PAEM, Martinez-de-pison FJ. Metamodel-based design optimization of structural one-way slabs based on deep learning neural networks to reduce environmental impact. Engineering Structures. 2018; 155:91-101.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[105]Yeh JP , Yeh SY. Application of genetic algorithms coupled with neural networks to optimization of reinforced concrete footings. Transactions on Machine Learning Artificial Intelligence. 2016; 4(4):18-35.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[106]Yeh J and Yang R. Optimal design of continuous reinforced concrete beams using neural networks. Transactions on Machine Learning Artificial Intelligence. 2015; 3(4):1–15.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[107]Nongsiej ET, Murugesan S. Design optimization of reinforced concrete beams by genetically optimized neural network technique. In IOP conference series: materials science and engineering 2020 (pp. 1-7). IOP Publishing.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[108]Nigdeli SM, Yücel M, Bekdaş G. A hybrid artificial intelligence model for design of reinforced concrete columns. Neural Computing and Applications. 2023; 35(10):7867-75.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[109]Meon MS, Anuar MA, Ramli MH, Kuntjoro W, Muhammad Z. Frame optimization using neural network. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology. 2012; 2(1):28-33.
[Google Scholar]
[110]Karabay A, Utemuratova R, Zhang D, Varol HA. Carbon footprint optimized design of sustainable reinforced concrete columns using deep learning. International Structural Engineering and Construction. 2022; 9(1):1-6.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[111]Izhar T, Singh K, Mumtaz N. Use of artificial neural network and fuzzy logic in optimization of collapsible roof. International Journal of Computational Engineering Research (IJCER). 2019; 9(4):38-50.
[Google Scholar]
[112]Pal SK, Takano A, Alanne K, Palonen M, Siren K. A multi-objective life cycle approach for optimal building design: a case study in Finnish context. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017; 143:1021-35.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[113]Smirnov A, Pashkin M, Shilov N, Levashova T, Kashevnik A. Context-aware operational decision support. In 10th international conference on information fusion 2007 (pp. 1-8). IEEE.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[114]Wang XZ, Zhou J, Huang ZL, Bi XL, Ge ZQ, Li L. A multilevel deep learning method for big data analysis and emergency management of power system. In international conference on big data analysis 2016 (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[115]Dalton SK, Atamturktur S, Farajpour I, Juang CH. An optimization based approach for structural design considering safety, robustness, and cost. Engineering Structures. 2013; 57:356-63.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[116]Agrawal P, Varakantham P. Proactive and reactive coordination of non-dedicated agent teams operating in uncertain environments. Proceedings of the 26th international joint conference on artificial intelligence 2017 (pp. 28-34).
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[117]Brown NC, Mueller CT. Design for structural and energy performance of long span buildings using geometric multi-objective optimization. Energy and Buildings. 2016; 127:748-61.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[118]Wang L, Zhang H, Zhu M, Chen YF. A new evolutionary structural optimization method and application for aided design to reinforced concrete components. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization. 2020; 62:2599-613.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[119]Gada M, Haria Z, Mankad A, Damania K, Sankhe S. Automated feature engineering and hyperparameter optimization for machine learning. In 7th international conference on advanced computing and communication systems 2021 (pp. 981-6). IEEE.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[120]Lu HY, Guo X. Optimization of reinforced concrete tall buildings using a hybrid genetic algorithm. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 2011; 94:815-9.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[121]Ekici B, Kazanasmaz ZT, Turrin M, Taşgetiren MF, Sariyildiz IS. Multi-zone optimisation of high-rise buildings using artificial intelligence for sustainable metropolises. part 2: optimisation problems, algorithms, results, and method validation. Solar Energy. 2021; 224:309-26.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[122]Pan Y, Zhang L. Roles of artificial intelligence in construction engineering and management: a critical review and future trends. Automation in Construction. 2021; 122:103517.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[123]Gan VJ, Lo IM, Ma J, Tse KT, Cheng JC, Chan CM. Simulation optimisation towards energy efficient green buildings: current status and future trends. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020; 254:120012.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[124]Li G, Lu H, Liu X. A hybrid genetic algorithm and optimality criteria method for optimum design of RC tall buildings under multi‐load cases. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings. 2010; 19(6):656-78.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[125]Yang R, Wang L. Multi-objective optimization for decision-making of energy and comfort management in building automation and control. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2012; 2(1):1-7.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[126]Stoiber N, Hammerl M, Kromoser B. Cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of CFRP reinforcement for concrete structures: calculation basis and exemplary application. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021; 280:124300.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[127]Bilal M, Oyedele LO. Guidelines for applied machine learning in construction industry-a case of profit margins estimation. Advanced Engineering Informatics. 2020; 43:101013.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[128]Vasant P, Zelinka I, Weber GW. Intelligent computing & optimization. Berlin: Springer International Publishing; 2019.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[129]Mckinney W. Data structures for statistical computing in Python. In proceedings of the 9th python in science conference 2010 (pp. 56-61).
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]