(Publisher of Peer Reviewed Open Access Journals)

International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration (IJATEE)

ISSN (Print):2394-5443    ISSN (Online):2394-7454
Volume-9 Issue-93 August-2022
Full-Text PDF
Paper Title : Parametric behaviour beam-to-column composite connection using CFS section
Author Name : R.M. Fadel Satria Albimanzura, Anis Saggaff, Mahmood MD Tahir and Kiagus Muhammad Aminuddin
Abstract :

Recently, cold-formed steel (CFS) has become a popular material for low- and medium-rise building structural elements. Where the CFS section assembles the beam and column parts. The merits of CFS might make the construction lighter and more effective to field modifications. In regions prone to earthquakes, the structure's mass is crucial. The combination of CFS and lightweight concrete is proposed to reduce the structure's weight and reduce the seismic activity of the building. This paper investigates the parametric behavior of beam-to-column composite connection using the CFS section, where the slab component is a lightweight concrete material. The CFS was constructed using a double-lipped channel (DLC) section that was arranged in a back-to-back arrangement. In contrast, the beam is made of DLC250 and the column is built of DLC300. In this research, a 5 mm gusset plate with a haunched gusset plate structure was presented. The isolated joint test of lightweight concrete (IJLW) with parametric method is carried out based on the Eurocode Standard to calculate the connection moment resistance, connection stiffness, and connection classification. According to the results of the parametric calculation, the connection's moment resistance was 67.28 kNm, and its stiffness was 1464.39 kNm/rad. The failure mode shows that the connection fails at beam bolt hole in bearing. The results show that the connection is classified as semi-rigid, partial strength, and ductile behavior.

Keywords : Cold-formed steel, Composite connection, Lghtweight concrete, Haunched gusset plate, Parametric study.
Cite this article : Albimanzura RF, Saggaff A, Tahir MM, Aminuddin KM. Parametric behaviour beam-to-column composite connection using CFS section. International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration. 2022; 9(93):1196-1208. DOI:10.19101/IJATEE.2021.875961.
References :
[1]Bernuzzi C, Cordova B. Structural steel design to Eurocode 3 and AISC specifications. John Wiley & Sons; 2016.
[Google Scholar]
[2]Yu C. Recent trends in cold-formed steel construction. Woodhead Publishing; 2016.
[Google Scholar]
[3]Yu WW, Laboube RA, Chen H. Cold-formed steel design. John Wiley & Sons; 2019.
[Google Scholar]
[4]Tamboli A. Handbook of structural steel connection design and details. McGraw-Hill Education; 2010.
[Google Scholar]
[5]Sulaiman A, Salleh NM, Sukardi N, Siang TC, Saggaff A. Experimental evaluation of composite beam-to-column joint using cold-formed steel sections. In conference series: materials science and engineering 2019 (pp.1-13). IOP Publishing.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[6]Amsyar F, Siang TC, Sulaiman A, Khun MC. Numerical and experimental study of semi-rigid beam-to-column composite connections in cold-formed steel. In AIP conference proceedings 2020. AIP Publishing LLC.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[7]Firdaus M, Saggaff A, Tahir MM, Aghlara R, Sulaiman A, Aminuddin K, et al. Influence of seat angles on the behaviour of cold-formed steel concrete composite joints. Journal of Constructional Steel Research. 2020.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[8]Yu S, Wu C, Zhou F, Wang P, Zhao K, Liu J. Experimental study and numerical simulation of a new prefabricated SRC column to steel beam composite joint. Structures 2020; 27:999-1010. Elsevier.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[9]Saggaff A, Tahir MM, Azimi M, Alhajri TM. Structural aspects of cold-formed steel section designed as U-shape composite beam. In AIP conference proceedings 2017 (pp. 1-11). AIP Publishing LLC.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[10]Desmaliana E, Herbudiman B, Ulfayani AM, Gunawan FA. Study of cold formed steel beam column joint to resist lateral load. In MATEC web of conferences 2019 (pp. 1-6). EDP Sciences.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[11]Bishay-Girges NW. Improved steel beam-column connections in industrial structures. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research. 2020; 10(1):5126-31.
[Google Scholar]
[12]Fahmy AS, Swelem SM, Mussttaf HH. Beam-column connections behavior of cold-formed steel members: New experimental configuration. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering. 2020; 24(7):2147-59.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[13]Amsyar F, Tan CS, Mohammad S, Tahir MM, Hamid HA. Partial strength beam-to-column connection of cold-formed single channel section: numerical and experimental study. ASM Journal. 2021.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[14]Vipin.V, Nair DS. Behaviour of cold-formed steel moment connections under cyclic loading. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology. 2021; 9(6):17-21.
[Google Scholar]
[15]Abaszadeh A, Rousta AM, Golsoorat PA, Beiranvand P. Behavior of connections in cold-formed steel frames under cycling loading. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction. 2021; 26(2):1-11.
[Google Scholar]
[16]Blum HB, Rasmussen KJ. Experimental investigation of long-span cold-formed steel double channel portal frames. Journal of Constructional Steel Research. 2019; 155:316-30.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[17]Cardoso FS, Zhang H, Rasmussen KJ, Yan S. Reliability calibrations for the design of cold-formed steel portal frames by advanced analysis. Engineering Structures. 2019; 182:164-71.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[18]Mccrum DP, Simon J, Grimes M, Broderick BM, Lim JB, Wrzesien AM. Experimental cyclic performance of cold-formed steel bolted moment resisting frames. Engineering Structures. 2019; 181:1-14.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[19]Rinchen R, Rasmussen KJ. Experiments on long-span cold-formed steel single C-section portal frames. Journal of Structural Engineering. 2020; 146(1):04019187.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[20]Chen Y, Huo J, Chen W, Hao H, Elghazouli AY. Experimental and numerical assessment of welded steel beam-column connections under impact loading. Journal of Constructional Steel Research. 2020.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[21]Wang Z, Nie X, Fan JS, Lu XY, Ding R. Experimental and numerical investigation of the interfacial properties of non-steam-cured UHPC-steel composite beams. Construction and Building Materials. 2019; 195:323-39.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[22]Zhang Y, Liu A, Chen B, Zhang J, Pi YL, Bradford MA. Experimental and numerical study of shear connection in composite beams of steel and steel-fibre reinforced concrete. Engineering Structures. 2020.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[23]Parastesh H, Mojtabaei SM, Taji H, Hajirasouliha I, Sabbagh AB. Constrained optimization of anti-symmetric cold-formed steel beam-column sections. Engineering Structures. 2021.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[24]Zhao J, Sun K, Yu C, Wang J. Tests and direct strength design on cold-formed steel channel beams with web holes. Engineering Structures. 2019; 184:434-46.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[25]Chen MT, Young B. Beam-column tests of cold-formed steel elliptical hollow sections. Engineering Structures. 2020.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[26]Gatheeshgar P, Poologanathan K, Gunalan S, Tsavdaridis KD, Nagaratnam B, Iacovidou E. Optimised cold-formed steel beams in modular building applications. Journal of Building Engineering. 2020.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[27]Shi Y, Yang K, Guan Y, Yao X, Xu L, Zhang H. The flexural behavior of cold-formed steel composite beams. Engineering Structures. 2020.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[28]Taheri E, Firouzianhaji A, Mehrabi P, Vosough HB, Samali B. Experimental and numerical investigation of a method for strengthening cold-formed steel profiles in bending. Applied Sciences. 2020; 10(11):1-31.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[29]Puluhulawa I. Behavior of shear connector variations on strengthened reinforced concrete slabs using cold formed steel. In conference series: earth and environmental science 2020 (pp. 1-8). IOP Publishing.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[30]Dar AR. An experimental study on the flexural behavior of cold-formed steel composite beams. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2020; 27:340-3.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[31]Roy K, Lau HH, Ting TC, Chen B, Lim JB. Flexural capacity of gapped built-up cold-formed steel channel sections including web stiffeners. Journal of Constructional Steel Research. 2020.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[32]Chen B, Roy K, Uzzaman A, Lim JB. Moment capacity of cold-formed channel beams with edge-stiffened web holes, un-stiffened web holes and plain webs. Thin-Walled Structures. 2020.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[33]Chen B, Roy K, Fang Z, Uzzaman A, Pham C, Raftery G, et al. Shear capacity of cold-formed steel channels with edge-stiffened web holes, un-stiffened web holes and plain webs. Journal of Structural Engineering. 2022; 148(2).
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[34]Karki D, Far H. State of the art on composite cold‐formed steel flooring systems. Steel Construction. 2021; 14(2):117-27.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[35]Dubina D, Ungureanu V, Kotelko M. Post-elastic capacity of thin-walled cold-formed steel members. In proceedings of the cold-formed steel research consortium colloquium 2020 (pp. 1-8).
[Google Scholar]
[36]Chen B, Roy K, Uzzaman A, Raftery G, Lim JB. Axial strength of back-to-back cold-formed steel channels with edge-stiffened holes, un-stiffened holes and plain webs. Journal of Constructional Steel Research. 2020.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[37]Roy K, Ting TC, Lau HH, Masood R, Alyousef R, Alabduljabbar H, et al. Cold-formed steel lipped channel section columns undergoing local-overall buckling interaction. International Journal of Steel Structures. 2021; 21(2):408-29.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[38]Mojtabaei SM, Becque J, Hajirasouliha I. Behavior and design of cold-formed steel bolted connections subjected to combined actions. Journal of Structural Engineering. 2021; 147(4).
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[39]Senapati S, Sangle KK. Nonlinear static analysis of cold-formed steel frame with rigid connections. Results in Engineering. 2022.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[40]Mojtabaei SM, Becque J, Hajirasouliha I. Local buckling in cold-formed steel moment-resisting bolted connections: behavior, capacity and design. Journal of Structural Engineering. 2020; 146(9).
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[41]Phan DT, Mojtabaei SM, Hajirasouliha I, Lau TL, Lim JB. Design and optimization of cold-formed steel sections in bolted moment connections considering bimoment. Journal of Structural Engineering. 2020; 146(8).
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[42]Chen X, Blum HB, Roy K, Pouladi P, Uzzaman A, Lim JB. Cold-formed steel portal frame moment-resisting joints: behaviour, capacity and design. Journal of Constructional Steel Research. 2021.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[43]Phan DT, Mojtabaei SM, Hajirasouliha I, Ye J, Lim JB. Coupled element and structural level optimisation framework for cold-formed steel frames. Journal of Constructional Steel Research. 2020.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[44]Hanisha CS, Kishore IS. Experimental and finite element analysis of cold formed steel beam-column joint. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2020; 33:480-3.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[45]Alemdar F, Geleta H, Algaadi F. Moment-rotation characteristics and finite element analysis of cold formed steel connections. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Engineering. 2021; 26(1):29-46.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[46]El AM, Amoush E, Soliman M. Numerical study of bolted moment connections in cold-formed steel frames. Future Engineering Journal. 2020; 1(1):1-12.
[Google Scholar]
[47]Wang X, Liu F, Li X, Li T, Xu X, Shui Z, Wu H. Static bearing capacity investigation of a novel prefabricated light-steel beam–column connection. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(9):4387.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[48]Mosheer KA, Dawood MB, Ghalib MH. Experimental study on beam-column connections of concrete encased cold-formed steel beams to concrete-filled steel tube columns. In IOP conference series: materials science and engineering 2021 (pp. 1-9). IOP Publishing.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[49]Jiang L, Zhang X, Ye J, Jiang L, Zhou L. Seismic behavior and damage assessment of mid-rise cold-formed steel-framed buildings with normal and reinforced beam-column joints. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering. 2021; 21(3):1-16.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[50]Papargyriou I, Mojtabaei SM, Hajirasouliha I, Becque J. Cyclic and monotonic moment-rotation behaviour of CFS web-connected beam-to-column joints. 1st Croatian conference on earthquake engineering 2021 (pp. 1067-77).
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[51]Mojtabaei SM, Hajirasouliha I, Ye J. Optimisation of cold-formed steel beams for best seismic performance in bolted moment connections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research. 2021.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[52]Bai Y, Wang S, Mou B, Wang Y, Skalomenos KA. Bi-directional seismic behavior of steel beam-column connections with outer annular stiffener. Engineering Structures. 2021.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[53]Zhang Z, Mao G, He R, Xiao A, Liu Z. Bearing capacity of composite joints of u-shaped steel composite beams and concrete-filled square steel tubular columns based on channel steel connection. Journal of Engineering Science & Technology Review. 2021; 14(4):40-52.
[Google Scholar]
[54]Jiang ZQ, Yang XF, Dou C, Pi YL, Li R. Design theory of earthquake-resilient prefabricated beam-column steel joint with double flange cover plates. Engineering Structures. 2020.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[55]Ye M, Jiang J, Chen HM, Zhou HY, Song DD. Seismic behavior of an innovative hybrid beam-column connection for precast concrete structures. Engineering Structures. 2021.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[56]Yang H. Performance analysis of semi-rigid connections in prefabricated high-rise steel structures. Structures. 2020; 28:837-46. Elsevier.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[57]Alrubaidi M, Abbas H, Elsanadedy H, Almusallam T, Iqbal R, Al-salloum Y. Experimental and FE study on strengthened steel beam-column joints for progressive collapse robustness under column-loss event. Engineering Structures. 2022.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[58]Tafsirojjaman T, Fawzia S, Thambiratnam DP, Zhao XL. FRP strengthened SHS beam-column connection under monotonic and large-deformation cyclic loading. Thin-Walled Structures. 2021.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[59]Venghiac VM, Olteanu-donțov I, Alexa-stratulat MS, Țăranu G, Băetu SA, Toma IO. FEM analyses on beam-to-column connection for a thin-walled cold-formed steel frame. In IOP conference series: materials science and engineering 2021 (pp. 1-9). IOP Publishing.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[60]Chen M, Huo JH, Xing YW. Seismic behavior of cold-formed steel frames with bolted moment connections. Journal of Structural Engineering. 2020; 146(3).
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[61]Lawan MM. Structural pereormance of cold-formed steel with self-compacting concrete in a composite beam system (Doctoral Dissertation, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia). 2015.
[Google Scholar]
[62]Wang F, Han Y, Yang J. Nonlinear FE analysis on stiffness and resistance of bolted cold-formed steel built-up joints. Structures. 2021; 33:2520-33. Elsevier.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]