(Publisher of Peer Reviewed Open Access Journals)

International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration (IJATEE)

ISSN (Print):2394-5443    ISSN (Online):2394-7454
Volume-9 Issue-91 June-2022
Full-Text PDF
Paper Title : Performance based seismic analysis of RC structural system under earthquake excitation
Author Name : Ranjith A, Kiran B M, Sanjith J, Mahesh Kumar C L and Shwetha K G
Abstract :

The most common cause of moment resistant framed constructions failing after an earthquake is soft storey collapse. This work uses performance-based seismic analysis to investigate the building's inelastic seismic response when subjected to earthquake ground motions, as well as to minimize the limitations of the traditional force-based technique. An eight-storey reinforced concrete building located in various seismic zones, situated on various soil types, and containing a masonry infill wall is evaluated using performance-based analysis. Models of plastic hinges are developed to determine the desired performance levels under seismic excitations, with an emphasis on the inelastic response of the buildings considered in this study. Pushover analysis is used to evaluate the seismic performance of building models with varying soft storeys. The performance point is calculated using FEMA 440 equivalent linearization and American society of civil engineers (ASCE) 41-13. The use of nonlinear time history analyses for some prominent earthquakes is also part of the performance-based seismic evaluation. The article illustrates how an increase in soft storey can change the seismic response of a building by reducing vertical rigidity. According to the obtained results, initial hinges are formed at lower-level columns and cross the collapse prevention (CP) level in later steps even before hinges are formed at upper level. As compared to the capacity spectrum method (CSM), displacement coefficient method (DCM) yielded lower seismic response results. Performance based seismic evaluation is compatible with time history analysis.

Keywords : Moment resisting frames, Soft storey, Masonry infill, Performance based analysis, Pushover analysis, Inelastic response.
Cite this article : Ranjith A, Kiran BM, Sanjith J, C L MK, Shwetha KG. Performance based seismic analysis of RC structural system under earthquake excitation . International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration. 2022; 9(91):735-758. DOI:10.19101/IJATEE.2021.875292.
References :
[1]Choudhari JD, Chopade NN. Performance based seismic design of RC building with consideration of soil structure interaction. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology. 2018; 5:2139-47.
[Google Scholar]
[2]Mabood A, Zameerruddin M, Shimpale PM. Performance-based seismic evaluation of vertically irregular moment resisting reinforced concrete frames using nonlinear statics analysis. International Journal of Civil Engineering. 2021; 8(6):8-19.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[3]Kumar A, Mavani S. Performance based seismic assessment of High-rise RC buildings. International Journal of Advances in Mechanical and Civil Engineering. 2021; 8(2):8-11.
[4]Sung YC, Liao WI, Yen WP. Performance-based concept on seismic evaluation of existing bridges. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration. 2009; 8(1):127-35.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[5]Ghobarah A. Performance-based design in earthquake engineering: state of development. Engineering Structures. 2001; 23(8):878-84.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[6]Khedkar AS, Dubal AR, Vasanwala AS. Performance based seismic design of reinforced concrete moment resistant frame with vertical setback. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology. 2014; 3(2).
[Google Scholar]
[7]Hamburger R, Rojahn C, Moehle J, Bachman R, Comartin C, Whittaker A. The ATC-58 project: development of next-generation performance-based earthquake engineering design criteria for buildings. In 13th world conference on earthquake engineering 2004 (pp. 1-15).
[Google Scholar]
[8]Priestley MJ. Performance based seismic design. Bulletin of the New Zealand society for Earthquake Engineering. 2000; 33(3):325-46.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[9]Mehare PS, Joshi MM. Performance based seismic design of RCC building. International Journal of Progressive Research in Science and Engineering. 2021; 2(7):80-3.
[Google Scholar]
[10]Priestley MJ. Displacement-based seismic assessment of reinforced concrete buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering. 1997; 1(1):157-92.
[Google Scholar]
[11]Moehle JP. Displacement based design of RC structures. In proceedings of the tenth conference on earthquake engineering 1992 (pp. 4297-302).
[Google Scholar]
[12]Chintanapakdee C, Chopra AK. Evaluation of modal pushover analysis using generic frames. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. 2003; 32(3):417-42.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[13]American Society of Civil Engineering. Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings. American Society of Civil Engineers. 2007.
[Google Scholar]
[14]Pekelnicky R, Engineers SD, Chris Poland SE, Engineers ND. ASCE 41-13: seismic evaluation and retrofit rehabilitation of existing buildings. Proceedings of the SEAOC. 2012.
[Google Scholar]
[15]https://www.atcouncil.org/pdfs/atc40toc.pdf. Accessed 24 May 2022.
[16]Council BS. FEMA 273–NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitations of buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington (DC). 1997.
[Google Scholar]
[17]Pre-standard FE. Commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, report FEMA-356. Washington, DC: SAC Joint Venture for the Federal Emergency Management Agency. 2000.
[Google Scholar]
[18]Fema A. 440, Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures. FEMA-440, Redwood City. 2005; 7(9):11.
[Google Scholar]
[19]FEMA F. 445. Next-generation performance-based seismic design guidelines program plan for new and existing buildings. Redwood City. 2006.
[Google Scholar]
[20]Freeman SA. Performance-based seismic engineering: past, current, and future. In structures congress 2000 2000.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[21]Zameeruddin M, Sangle KK. Performance-based seismic assessment of reinforced concrete moment resisting frame. Journal of King Saud University-Engineering Sciences. 2021; 33(3):153-65.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[22]https://www.iitk.ac.in/ce/test/IS-codes/is.456.2000.pdf. Accessed 24 August 2022.
[23]Rehan M, Azam F. Performance based design of RCC structure. International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and Innovations in Technology. 2018; 4(4):1059-63.
[Google Scholar]
[24]Ingale C, Nalamwar MR. Performance based seismic design of RCC building. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology. 2017; 4(10):618-23.
[Google Scholar]
[25]Naik P, Annigeri S. Performance evaluation of 9 storey RC building located in North Goa. Procedia Engineering. 2017; 173:1841-6.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[26]Noh NM, Aznin NI, Zin MH, Ghari MA, Zahari MA, Rushdi MF. Seismic assessment of reinforced concrete frame with unreinforced masonry infill walls in Malaysia. In proceedings of the 5th international conference on sustainable civil engineering structures and construction materials 2022 (pp. 379-90). Springer, Singapore.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[27]Demir A. Investigation of the effect of real ground motion record number on seismic response of regular and vertically irregular RC frames. Structures. 2022; 39: 1074-91. Elsevier.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[28]Leti M, Bilginb H. Damage potential of near and far-fault ground motions on seismic response of RC buildings designed according to old practices. Research on Engineering Structures and Materials. 2022; 8(2):337-57.
[Google Scholar]
[29]Demirel IO, Yakut A, Binici B. Seismic performance of mid-rise reinforced concrete buildings in Izmir Bayrakli after the 2020 Samos earthquake. Engineering Failure Analysis. 2022.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[30]Sarvade RD, Kulkarni SK. Analytical study on storey shear and base shear of H shape and step back set back multistoried buildings on sloping ground. International Journal of Innovative Research in Technology. 2022; 8(10):593-7.
[31]Patil ST, Chavan MA. A comparative study on dynamic analysis of multi-storied building (G+24) with vertical irregularities. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology. 2022; 9(3):1983-6.
[32]Mouhine M, Hilali E. Seismic vulnerability assessment of RC buildings with setback irregularity. Ain Shams Engineering Journal. 2022; 13(1).
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[33]Miari M, Jankowski R. Seismic gap between buildings founded on different soil types experiencing pounding during earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra. 2022; 38(3):2183-206.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[34]Lehman D, Moehle J, Mahin S, Calderone A, Henry L. Experimental evaluation of the seismic performance of reinforced concrete bridge columns. Journal of Structural Engineering. 2004; 130(6):869-79.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[35]Zou XK, Chan CM. Optimal seismic performance-based design of reinforced concrete buildings using nonlinear pushover analysis. Engineering Structures. 2005; 27(8):1289-302.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[36]Ali RK. Evaluation of various methods of FEMA356 compare to FEMA440. Journal of Civil Engineering and Construction Technology. 2013; 4(2):51-5.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[37]Akkar S, Metin A. Assessment of improved nonlinear static procedures in FEMA-440. Journal of Structural Engineering-Asce. 2007; 133(9):1237-46.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[38]Saleemuddin M, Mohd Z, Sangle KK. Seismic damage assessment of reinforced concrete structure using non-linear static analyses. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering. 2017; 21(4):1319-30.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[39]Mathieu GO, Abdullah AS, Saad LA. Performance-based seismic design for buildings. Structural Mechanics of Engineering Structures and Structures. 2020; 16(2):161-6.
[Google Scholar]
[40]Inel M, Ozmen HB. Effects of plastic hinge properties in nonlinear analysis of reinforced concrete buildings. Engineering Structures. 2006; 28(11):1494-502.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[41]De RMT, Di DM, Ricci P, Verderame GM, Manfredi G. Experimental investigation on the influence of the aspect ratio on the in-plane/out-of-plane interaction for masonry infills in RC frames. Engineering Structures. 2019; 189:523-40.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[42]Dolšek M, Fajfar P. The effect of masonry infills on the seismic response of a four-storey reinforced concrete frame-a deterministic assessment. Engineering Structures. 2008; 30(7):1991-2001.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[43]Furtado A, Rodrigues H, Arêde A, Varum H. Influence of the in plane and out-of-plane masonry infill walls’ interaction in the structural response of RC buildings. Procedia Engineering. 2015; 114:722-9.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[44]Hashemi SA. Seismic evaluation of reinforced concrete buildings including effects of masonry infill walls. University of California, Berkeley; 2007.
[Google Scholar]
[45]Agrawal P, Shrikhande M. Earthquake resistant design of structures. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.; 2006.
[Google Scholar]
[46]Ozkaynak H, Yuksel E, Yalcin C, Dindar AA, Buyukozturk O. Masonry infill walls in reinforced concrete frames as a source of structural damping. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. 2014; 43(7):949-68.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[47]Ricci P, Di DM, Verderame GM. Experimental assessment of the in-plane/out-of-plane interaction in unreinforced masonry infill walls. Engineering Structures. 2018; 173:960-78.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[48]Standard I. Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures. Bureau of Indian Standards, Part. 1893.
[Google Scholar]
[49]Peters TF. International association for bridge and structural engineering: the first 80 years 1929-2009. IABSE; 2011.
[Google Scholar]
[50]Pavithra R, Prakash DT. Study of behavior of the soft stories at different locations in the multi-story building. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology. 2018; 7(6):53-9.
[Google Scholar]
[51]Tiwari P, Salunke PJ, Gore NG. Earthquake resistant design of open ground storey building. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology. 2015; 2(7): 63-71.
[Google Scholar]
[52]Yoshimura M. Nonlinear analysis of a reinforced concrete building with a soft first story collapsed by the 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu Earthquake. Cement and Concrete Composites. 1997; 19(3):213-21.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]