(Publisher of Peer Reviewed Open Access Journals)

International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration (IJATEE)

ISSN (Print):2394-5443    ISSN (Online):2394-7454
Volume-8 Issue-81 August-2021
Full-Text PDF
Paper Title : Embodied energy and operational energy computations for a typical G+3 residential building in Vijayawada city of Andhra Pradesh, India
Author Name : Jagadish Vengala, K. Ramesh, Manjunatha M, Manish S Dharek and B Krishna Siva Kumar
Abstract :

Energy computations in commercial and residential buildings have been studied over the past few years by various researchers. The studies have revealed an interesting relation between the materials used in the building, the manufacturing process, the construction process, and its overall impact on the environment. However, limited studies have been conducted on the computation of the Embodied Energy (EE) and the Operational Energy (OE) of residential buildings. In the present investigation, an attempt has been made to compute these two factors (EE and OE) for a residential building situated in Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India. The case study chosen here is an exciting example of a reinforced cement concrete framed structure with ground + three floors. Based on the conducted studies, the EE computations show that a huge amount of energy is used for materials such as cement, steel, and bricks. The use of alternative building materials to these and technologies can help in reducing EE. OE can be reduced during the lifetime of the building by implementing different methods of energy conservation. The energy consumption in a typical residential building depends on the types of appliances, usage hours, the consumption of the devices, etc. Changes in any one of these could alter the annual energy consumption, and thus, the OE. The EE content is experienced once separately from maintenance and renovation, whereas OE gathers over time and can be prejudiced throughout the life of the structure.

Keywords : Residential buildings, OE, Energy computations, EE, Thermal comfort.
Cite this article : Vengala J, Ramesh K, Manjunatha M, Dharek MS, Kumar BS. Embodied energy and operational energy computations for a typical G+3 residential building in Vijayawada city of Andhra Pradesh, India. International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration. 2021; 8(81):1049-1058. DOI:10.19101/IJATEE.2021.874169.
References :
[1]Alwan Z, Nawarathna A, Ayman R, Zhu M, Elghazi Y. Framework for parametric assessment of operational and embodied energy impacts utilising BIM. Journal of Building Engineering. 2021; 42:1-15.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[2]Su X, Tian S, Shao X, Zhao X. Embodied and operational energy and carbon emissions of passive building in HSCW zone in China: a case study. Energy and Buildings. 2020.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[3]Pakdel A, Ayatollahi H, Sattary S. Embodied energy and CO2 emissions of life cycle assessment (LCA) in the traditional and contemporary Iranian construction systems. Journal of Building Engineering. 2021.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[4]Dascalaki EG, Argiropoulou P, Balaras CA, Droutsa KG, Kontoyiannidis S. Analysis of the embodied energy of construction materials in the life cycle assessment of Hellenic residential buildings. Energy and Buildings. 2021.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[5]García-sanz-calcedo J, D SNN, Fernandes JP. Measurement of embodied carbon and energy of HVAC facilities in healthcare centers. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[6]Shadram F, Mukkavaara J. Exploring the effects of several energy efficiency measures on the embodied/operational energy trade-off: a case study of Swedish residential buildings. Energy and Buildings. 2019; 183:283-96.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[7]Kumar N, Brijbhushan S, Maneeth PD, Shreenivas RS, Siddharth B. Experimental study on strength properties of concrete replacing cement by marble dust and sand by iron ore tailings. International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration. 2018; 5(45):255-61.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[8]Venkatraj V, Dixit MK. Life cycle embodied energy analysis of higher education buildings: a comparison between different LCI methodologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2021.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[9]Vengala J. Comparison of embodied energy in different bamboo-based houses. In advances in sustainable construction materials 2020 (pp. 197-208). Springer, Singapore.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[10]Ajayi SO, Oyedele LO, Ilori OM. Changing significance of embodied energy: a comparative study of material specifications and building energy sources. Journal of Building Engineering. 2019; 23:324-33.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[11]Cabeza LF, Boquera L, Chàfer M, Vérez D. Embodied energy and embodied carbon of structural building materials: worldwide progress and barriers through literature map analysis. Energy and Buildings. 2021.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[12]Manjunatha M, Preethi S, Mounika HG, Niveditha KN. Life cycle assessment (LCA) of concrete prepared with sustainable cement-based materials. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2021.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[13]Li CZ, Lai X, Xiao B, Tam VW, Guo S, Zhao Y. A holistic review on life cycle energy of buildings: an analysis from 2009 to 2019. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2020.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[14]Vengala J, Nath SK, Pandey CN. Energy consumption of wood based panel products: a review. Journal of the Indian Academy of Wood Science. 2011; 8:80-3.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[15]Tangadagi RB, Manjunatha M, Bharath A, Preethi S. Utilization of steel slag as an eco-friendly material in concrete for construction. Journal of Green Engineering. 2020; 10(5):2408-19.
[Google Scholar]
[16]Preethi S, Tangadagi RB, Manjunatha M, Bharath A. Sustainable effect of chemically treated aggregates on bond strength of bitumen. Journal of Green Engineering. 2020; 10:5076-89.
[Google Scholar]
[17]Manjunatha M, Raju KV, Sivapullaiah PV. Effect of PVC dust on the performance of cement concrete—a sustainable approach. In recent developments in sustainable infrastructure 2021 (pp. 607-17). Springer, Singapore.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[18]Ashwini K, Rao PS. Behavior of concrete using alccofine and nano-silica under elevated temperature. International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration. 2021; 8(78):600-18.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[19]Reshma TV, Manjunatha M, Bharath A, Tangadagi RB, Vengala J, Manjunatha LR. Influence of ZnO and TiO2 on mechanical and durability properties of concrete prepared with and without polypropylene fibers. Materialia. 2021.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[20]Tangadagi RB, Manjunatha M, Preethi S, Bharath A, Reshma TV. Strength characteristics of concrete using coconut shell as a coarse aggregate–a sustainable approach. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2021.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[21]Tangadagi RB, Manjunatha M, Seth D, Preethi S. Role of mineral admixtures on strength and durability of high strength self compacting concrete: an experimental study. Materialia. 2021.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[22]Agustina AF, Saloma S, Nurjannah SA, Usman AP, Hanafiah H. Numerical analysis of the behavior of light concrete panels with variations of thickness and door opening position in resisting static monotonic loads (similarity). International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration. 2020; 7(73):201-19.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[23]Septriansyah V, Saggaff A. Characteristics of nanocomposite polymer with temperature variation and heating time by using simple mixing method. International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration. 2021; 8(78):651.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[24] Abbasi S, Noorzai E. The BIM-based multi-optimization approach in order to determine the trade-off between embodied and operation energy focused on renewable energy use. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021.
[Google Scholar]
[25]Minunno R, Ogrady T, Morrison GM, Gruner RL. Investigating the embodied energy and carbon of buildings: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of life cycle assessments. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2021.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[26]Shirazi A, Ashuri B. Embodied life cycle assessment (LCA) comparison of residential building retrofit measures in Atlanta. Building and Environment. 2020.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[27]Adegbeye MJ, Reddy PR, Obaisi AI, Elghandour MM, Oyebamiji KJ, Salem AZ, et al. Sustainable agriculture options for production, greenhouse gasses and pollution alleviation, and nutrient recycling in emerging and transitional nations-an overview. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[28]Nguyen TK, Ngo HH, Guo W, Nguyen TL, Chang SW, Nguyen DD, et al. Environmental impacts and greenhouse gas emissions assessment for energy recovery and material recycle of the wastewater treatment plant. Science of The Total Environment. 2021.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[29]Su X, Zhang X. A detailed analysis of the embodied energy and carbon emissions of steel-construction residential buildings in China. Energy and Buildings. 2016; 119:323-30.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[30]Kumanayake R, Luo H, Paulusz N. Assessment of material related embodied carbon of an office building in Sri Lanka. Energy and Buildings. 2018; 166:250-7.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[31]Norman J, Maclean HL, Kennedy CA. Comparing high and low residential density: life-cycle analysis of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. Journal of Urban Planning and Development. 2006; 132(1):10-21.
[Google Scholar]
[32]Fuller RJ, Crawford RH. Impact of past and future residential housing development patterns on energy demand and related emissions. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment. 2011; 26:165-83.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[33]Stephan A, Crawford RH. A multi-scale life-cycle energy and greenhouse-gas emissions analysis model for residential buildings. Architectural Science Review. 2014; 57(1):39-48.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[34]Stephan A, Crawford RH, De Myttenaere K. A comprehensive assessment of the life cycle energy demand of passive houses. Applied Energy. 2013; 112:23-34.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[35]Juanico LE. Thermal insulation of roofs by using multiple air gaps separated by insulating layers of low infrared emissivity. Construction and Building Materials. 2020.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[36]Stephan A, Stephan L. Life cycle energy and cost analysis of embodied, operational and user-transport energy reduction measures for residential buildings. Applied Energy. 2016; 161:445-64.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[37]Torres-rivas A, Pozo C, Palumbo M, Ewertowska A, Jiménez L, Boer D. Systematic combination of insulation biomaterials to enhance energy and environmental efficiency in buildings. Construction and Building Materials. 2021.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[38]Ekinci A. Effect of preparation methods on strength and microstructural properties of cemented marine clay. Construction and Building Materials. 2019.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[39]Koh CH, Kraniotis D. A review of material properties and performance of straw bale as building material. Construction and Building Materials. 2020; 259:120385.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[40]Selvaranjan K, Navaratnam S, Gamage JC, Thamboo J, Siddique R, Zhang J, et al. Thermal and environmental impact analysis of rice husk ash-based mortar as insulating wall plaster. Construction and Building Materials. 2021.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[41]Meek AH, Elchalakani M, Beckett CT, Grant T. Alternative stabilised rammed earth materials incorporating recycled waste and industrial by-products: life cycle assessment. Construction and Building Materials. 2021.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[42]Lam KL, Kenway SJ, Lane JL, Islam KN, De BRB. Energy intensity and embodied energy flow in Australia: an input-output analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019; 226:357-68.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[43]Guo S, Zheng S, Hu Y, Hong J, Wu X, Tang M. Embodied energy use in the global construction industry. Applied Energy. 2019.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[44]Muguda S, Lucas G, Hughes PN, Augarde CE, Perlot C, Bruno AW, et al. Durability and hygroscopic behaviour of biopolymer stabilised earthen construction materials. Construction and Building Materials. 2020.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[45]Dixit MK. Life cycle recurrent embodied energy calculation of buildings: a review. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019; 209:731-54.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[46]Sabnis A, Pranesh MR. Sustainability evaluation of buildings in pre-use phase using figure of merit as a new tool. Energy and Buildings. 2017; 145:121-9.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[47]https://edgebuildings.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/IFC-India-Construction-Materials-Database-Methodology-Report.pdf. Accessed 26 April 2021.