(Publisher of Peer Reviewed Open Access Journals)
Navigation

International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration (IJATEE)

ISSN (Print):2394-5443    ISSN (Online):2394-7454
Volume-8 Issue-76 March-2021
Full-Text PDF
Paper Title : Talent cap module: the implementation of digital and non-digital assessment game in collaborative learning environment
Author Name : Nurul Hidayah Mat Zain, Idris Osman, Rachel Samuel, Suhailah Kassim, Suraya Hamimi Mastor and Halimahton Borhan
Abstract :

Integrating the digital and non-digital assessment games for use in the classroom can enhance the user experience even when the course is challenging. Therefore, this study explores the user experience when a Talent Cap Module (TCM) is implemented in the Talent Recruitment and Selection course. The TCM consists of two types of significant components, digital assessment games: Talent Race and Talent Feud and non-digital assessment games: Talent Mind and Talent Gram. The students answered a questionnaire based on the MEEGA+ model after they experienced the TCM module. The study findings indicated that the TCM enhanced the engaging experience of learning the Talent Recruitment and Selection course. Keenly, the results of the study will emphasize games as an approach to learning non-computer science subjects.
Keywords : Assessment game, User experience, Talent cap module, MEEGA+ model, Engagement.
Cite this article : Zain NH, Osman I, Samuel R, Kassim S, Mastor SH, Borhan H. Talent cap module: the implementation of digital and non-digital assessment game in collaborative learning environment. International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration. 2021; 8(76):496-510. DOI:10.19101/IJATEE.2020.762184.
References :
[1]Onofrei G, Ferry P. Reusable learning objects: a blended learning tool in teaching computer-aided design to engineering undergraduates. International Journal of Educational Management. 2020; 34(10):1559-75.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[2]Rasheed RA, Kamsin A, Abdullah NA. Challenges in the online component of blended learning: a systematic review. Computers & Education. 2020.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[3]Vanslambrouck S, Zhu C, Lombaerts K, Philipsen B, Tondeur J. Students motivation and subjective task value of participating in online and blended learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education. 2018; 36:33-40.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[4]Estacio RR, Raga Jr RC. Analyzing students online learning behavior in blended courses using moodle. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal. 2017; 12(1):52-68.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[5]Bayrak T, Akcam B. Understanding student perceptions of a web-based blended learning environment. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. 2017; 9(4):577-97.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[6]Dwivedi A, Dwivedi P, Bobek S, Zabukovšek SS. Factors affecting students’ engagement with online content in blended learning. Kybernetes. 2019; 48(7):1500-15.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[7]Ghazal S, Al-Samarraie H, Wright B. A conceptualization of factors affecting collaborative knowledge building in online environments. Online Information Review. 2019; 44(1):62-89.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[8]Isaias P. Model for the enhancement of learning in higher education through the deployment of emerging technologies. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society. 2018; 16(4):401-12.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[9]Wieser D, Seeler JM. Online, not distance education: the merits of collaborative learning in online education. The Disruptive Power of Online Education 2018:125-46. Emerald Publishing Limited.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[10]Sivapalan S. Sustainability, blended learning and the undergraduate communication skills classroom: negotiating engineering undergraduates’ expectations and perceptions. On the Horizon. 2017; 25(1):7-23.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[11]Chan SC, Wan CJ, Ko S. Interactivity, active collaborative learning, and learning performance: The moderating role of perceived fun by using personal response systems. The International Journal of Management Education. 2019; 17(1):94-102.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[12]Dukuzumuremyi S, Siklander P. Interactions between pupils and their teacher in collaborative and technology-enhanced learning settings in the inclusive classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2018; 76:165-74.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[13]Deckert R, Heymann F, Metz M. Game-based learning as education method in the digital age: experiences at the highest military education institution in germany with online and offline game formats related to developing competencies. The Disruptive Power of Online Education 2018:185-204. Emerald Publishing Limited.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[14]Mercer TG, Kythreotis AP, Robinson ZP, Stolte T, George SM, Haywood SK. The use of educational game design and play in higher education to influence sustainable behaviour. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 2017; 18(3):359-84.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[15]Emblen-Perry K. Enhancing student engagement in business sustainability through games. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 2018; 19(5):858-76.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[16]Barbara J. Measuring user experience in multiplayer board games. Games and Culture. 2017; 12(7-8):623-49.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[17]Begy J. Board games and the construction of cultural memory. Games and Culture. 2017; 12(7-8):718-38.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[18]Fjællingsdal KS, Klöckner CA. Green across the board: Board games as tools for dialogue and simplified environmental communication. Simulation & Gaming. 2020; 51(5):632-52.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[19]Chen J, Wang M, Kirschner PA, Tsai CC. The role of collaboration, computer use, learning environments, and supporting strategies in CSCL: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research. 2018; 88(6):799-843.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[20]Dimitriadou A, Djafarova N, Turetken O, Verkuyl M, Ferworn A. Challenges in serious game design and development: educators’ experiences. Simulation & Gaming. 2020; 52(2):132-52.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[21]Imlig-Iten N, Petko D. Comparing serious games and educational simulations: effects on enjoyment, deep thinking, interest and cognitive learning gains. Simulation & Gaming. 2018; 49(4):401-22.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[22]Von Gillern S, Alaswad Z. Games and game-based learning in instructional design. International Journal of Technologies in Learning. 2016; 23(4):1-7.
[Google Scholar]
[23]Deif A. Insights on lean gamification for higher education. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma. 2017; 8(3):359-76.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[24]Petri G, Von Wangenheim CG, Borgatto AF. MEEGA+: an evolution of a model for the evaluation of educational games. INCoD/GQS. 2016.
[Google Scholar]
[25]Kapp KM. The gamification of learning and instruction: game-based methods and strategies for training and education. John Wiley & Sons; 2012.
[Google Scholar]
[26]Zain NH, Zaini H, Zulhemay MN, Baharum A, Bustamam WF, Razak FH. Engaging game design in learning historical patriotic heroes: students perceptions. Pertanika Journal of Science & Technology. 2017; 25(S):197-204.
[Google Scholar]
[27]Hawari N, Zain NH, Baharum A. The need of gamified assessment for engaging learning experience. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics. 2020; 9(2):722-8.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[28]Naik N. A comparative evaluation of game-based learning: digital or non-digital games. In European conference on games based learning 2014 (pp. 433-45). Academic Conferences International Limited.
[Google Scholar]
[29]Palomino P, Toda A, Oliveira W, Rodrigues L, Cristea A, Isotani S. Exploring content game elements to support gamification design in educational systems: narrative and storytelling. In Brazilian symposium on computers in education (Simpósio brasileiro de informática na educação-SBIE) 2019 (pp. 773-82).
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[30]Toda AM, Palomino PT, Oliveira W, Rodrigues L, Klock AC, Gasparini I, et al. How to gamify learning systems? an experience report using the design sprint method and a taxonomy for gamification elements in education. Journal of Educational Technology & Society. 2019; 22(3):47-60.
[Google Scholar]
[31]Smith BL, MacGregor J, Matthews R, Gabelnick F. Learning communities: reforming undergraduate education. 2009. Jossey-Bass.
[Google Scholar]
[32]Kuh GD. Excerpt from high-impact educational practices: what they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Association of American Colleges and Universities. 2008; 14(3):28-9.
[Google Scholar]
[33]Tinto V. Leaving college:rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. University of Chicago Press, 5801 S. Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637; 1987.
[Google Scholar]
[34]Schreiner LA, Louis MC, Nelson DD. Thriving in transitions: a research-based approach to college student success. Stylus Publishing, LLC; 2020.
[Google Scholar]
[35]Yue CL, Bjork EL, Bjork RA. Reducing verbal redundancy in multimedia learning: an undesired desirable difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2013; 105(2):266-77.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[36]Lui S. Use of gasification in vocabulary learning: a case study in Macau. In 4th CELC symposium proceedings 2014 (pp. 90-7).
[Google Scholar]
[37]Foulsham T, Farley J, Kingstone A. Mind wandering in sentence reading: decoupling the link between mind and eye. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2013; 67(1):51-9.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[38]Saravanakumar D, Mohan B, Muthuramalingam T. A study on influence of system parameters on servo pneumatic system and multi-response optimization using taguchi–grey methodology. In Applied Mechanics and Materials 2015:901-5. Trans Tech Publications Ltd.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[39]Martin AJ, Dowson M. Interpersonal relationships, motivation, engagement, and achievement: Yields for theory, current issues, and educational practice. Review of educational research. 2009; 79(1):327-65.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[40]Frymier AB, Shulman GM. “What in it for me?”: increasing content relevance to enhance students motivation. Communication Education. 1995; 44(1):40-50.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[41]Bacon DR. Reporting actual and perceived student learning in education research. Journal of Marketing Education. 2016; 38(1):3-6.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[42]Alqurashi E. Predicting student satisfaction and perceived learning within online learning environments. Distance Education. 2019; 40(1):133-48.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[43]Moreno R, Mayer RE. Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning: when reading helps listening. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2002; 94(1):156-63.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[44]Barbera E, Clara M, Linder-Vanberschot JA. Factors influencing student satisfaction and perceived learning in online courses. E-learning and Digital Media. 2013; 10(3):226-35.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]